Collectors Weekly – Follow Us Ontwitter

admin    nice dresses for parties    

That style dominated throughout the 1950s, especially for the middleclass woman in America.

I know that the New Look worked its way down to her, she was buying that trickledown fashion, she was not buying Dior.

It’s really the first time we see Middle America wearing these cute, strapless, promstyle dresses. They fal off, you have these beautiful dresses that the bride and bridesmaids are constantly hiking up being that they’re attached with cheap stretch fabric. That’s right! They’re moving their hips, They’re moving their legs. They wanted to show off that movement.

They’ve been moving their whole bodies. It was also amid the first times women were moving more than just their feet when they danced. Now that the jeansandTshirts plague has reached our fancy restaurants, cocktail parties, and nightclubs, it seems as though no one except cares about dressing up anymore. Via metmuseum.org. Left, with that said, this Yves Saint Laurent ensemble from 1980 raised the bar for bold shoulder detailing. Of course, since it didn’t matter if you wore identical dress, most ‘middleclass’ women should have had one good dress to wear for evening. Weddings, and similar formal occasions.You didn’t have dresses for different occasions. So in case you were wealthy enough to have a party dress, the party dress is definitely more casual now, and there’s a much wider types of silhouettes and styles.’One hundred’ years ago, you didn’t own a huge variety. Now please pay attention. People wouldn’t even know you wore identical dress repeatedly, you didn’t have as many parties to go to. You weren’t should be photographed and have your pictures spread around. You can’t see corsetry built into a dress anymore, unless you’re buying expensive formalwear.

Did you know that the literal foundation of the garment is of much lower quality, not only are the rhinestones and fabrics cheaper today.

Right, with that said, this Vionnet gown shows how lowcut backs contrasted with excessively low hemlines, even in the Depressionera when extra fabric was a true luxury.

Left, therefore this 1930s advertisement shows the diagonal seams and limited ornamentation of popular bias cut dresses. Then again, middleclass women could consume, the economy was great. Now look. With more ready made clothing, fashion production became easier and cheaper. More than a hundred years ago, you wouldn’t have had enough clothing to designate certain dresses for special occasions. Moving into the 1910s and ’20s, we started to see major upward mobility. You also had a more streamlined effect as mod influenced fashion in all areas.

It was the first time you had skirts above the knee.

We’re planning to focus on the youth of today.

We’re tired of these ‘used up’, old fashioned ideas. Your party dress was probably a basic, ‘A line’ shift dress that hung its weight from the upper body. Young women wanted to wear short skirts. It went straight from the shoulder to the hem, or had an A line effect, it didn’t necessarily hug the bust. Then the 1960s were like Heck no! You can find chic, wellmade frocks, and afford them, will fall apart. I lived through much of what was represented here, as a Boomer born in 1951. Accordingly the organization by decade is a great presentation of the fashions of the times. You can find a lot more info about this stuff on this site. They really wanted to live it up, when people went to a party. As a result, in the course of the daytime, everyone had to be very utilitarian. Sounds familiardoes it not? It’s this culture of escapism.

Hollywood movies in the 1930s are all about escaping the troubles of the economy and everyday life.

The French designer Madeleine Vionnet is the most credited with mastering the bias cut.

You should think they’d use less fabric, yet the bias cut actually uses more fabric, since we were in the Depression. It wasn’t just one fabric and one color. It’s not anything loud. You definitely see them in the ’50s, mostly small florals, novelty prints got started in the 1940s. It’s always small and feminine and pretty. You should take it into account. It should probably have some netting, lace, silk satin, or rayon on it, if the dress was one color. Then again, we turned to super bright and neon colors, in the ’80s, people wanted something fresh and different. Besides, in the 1970s, the colors were really muted and muddy, these earthy rusts and oranges and greens.

You turn the pattern on a diagonal and lay it on to the fabric, with the bias cut.

It hugs the body more closely because That changes the fit of a garment.

It hugs your curves, since there’s more stretch on the bias. We go from the boxy, boyish shape of the ‘20s to a very womanly shape. They’re now diagonally on the body, The lengthwise and crosswise grain are not horizontal or vertical on the body. You should take this seriously. In the 21st century, we look for to see a bit more of the body, and designers weren’t really showing much of it as long as women didn’t seek for to look womanly. Accordingly the dresses were these boxy, boyish shapes, and to our contemporary eye, that doesn’t look very chic. They always have to slim them down as long as the dresses were quite dumpy by today’s standards, when costume designers create garments for movies set in the ’20s. While meaning they weren’t being held up at the bust it was the woman’s waist and her hips that held up the dress, most strapless dresses in the 1950s were boned and had petershams.

Instead of better tailoring or putting in boning or a petersham, nowadays, designers make up a lot through stretch fabrics, that was like a waistband that was put inside a dress to attach the bodice to your waist.

She’s seeing those looks in magazines, and copying them herself.Styles from different Eastern countries were often melded into one garment.

We have a robe in the Columbia collection that has Japanese ‘kimono style’ sleeves, Chinesestyle metallic embroidery, and colors that look ‘Indian influenced’. For example, this all has a trickle down effect. It’s not that the middle class woman in America was buying Poiret. Even when it used a great deal more material than a setin sleeve should, the dolman sleeve was very popular. That’s right! For the most part, they’ve been cutting back on fabric, that definitely flouted the law. You should take it into account. There’s excess fabric under the arm, it’s all one piece. It’s similar to a loose, ‘kimonostyle’ sleeve without seam between the bodice and the sleeve. Now regarding the aforementioned fact… They generally went just past the hip, or fell somewhere between the knee and hip, and flared out around the hoop.

Some were less shapely and more sacklike, and others had a lampshade look with a hoop around the hip area.

We had a lampshade style dress, when I worked with the collection at North Dakota State University.

The lampshade silhouette was pretty avant garde. Socialite Betsy von Furstenberg and friends getting dressed in a Look magazine article from When the strapless dress first became popular, its structural foundation was much stronger compared to modern dresses of stretch fabric. Publicity stills taken of Norma Shearer (left, in and Jean Harlow (right, in flaunt their sultry, biascut silk dresses. Essentially, the 1960s are interesting as you start to see a speeding up of trends.

By the end of the ’60s, mod was almost dead, and fashion had moved onto this very chunky embellishment, especially for party dresses. Women wanted heavier, more bohemian embellishments on their dresses, instead of streamlined. Women were going places ‘unchaperoned’ and were just more physically mobile. As a result, there’s a gentleman or driver to mostly there’re lots of them.

If you enjoyed this article please consider sharing it!