Purple Cocktail Dresses: Ready To Start Publishing More Video

Not anymore. Yea letting parents decide works real well on any given day on the streets doesn’t it?. My daughter went to Prom for 4 years and bought 4 new dresses. Eventually, she paid for any of them herself, but my husband and I had no complaints about any one them (except that she could’ve really just worn similar one any year. Under President Obama, the Education Department usually and its Office for Civil Rights actually was in the hands of ‘left wing’ zealots who were determined to use their power to further ideological ends.

What mattered was keeping the politically useful myth that our campuses are in the grip of a rape epidemic alive.

OCR officials sent out Dear Colleague letters meant to force schools to adopt a system of handling sexual assault allegations that would yield the greatest number of penalties for male students.

Whether not didn’t matter, or they have been actually guilty

Some community colleges are enrolling students with GPAs as low as Why, under state law, only high school students who have at least a 0 GPA are eligible.

Being that it means more state funding coming their way. In this new Martin Center article, Shannon Watkins looks at North Carolina’s dual enrollment program and finds that mostly there’s plenty of skullduggery going on. In this Bach was like Little Richard. Encyclopedic knowledge, the elaborate numerological games, the show off skill it’s all him. He must have sounded identical in the premises as he did playing for Frederick the Great. Certainly, officials could see information posted privately in addition to public posts, The biggest change to policy must be asking applicants to hand over their telephones so officials could examine their stored contacts and perhaps other information.A second change will ask applicants for their socialmedia handles and passwords.

Shifting the argument to the supposed unfitness of Neil Gorsuch belies the record. Another unimpeachable, textualist judge should not please Schumer one bit, Schumer clearly argued that he planned on opposing whomever Trump nominated. Basically the argument that the Senate has a constitutional obligation to confirm a nominee is even more clearly laughable, while the argumentthat the Senate has a constitutional obligation to hold hearings and a vote on a nominee is laughable. Under this scenario, we would have largely avoided arguments that Senate Republicans had somehow violated the Constitution. By the way I do question its necessity, while I don’t question the prudence of the ence rule. While he was serving in the House, I doubt seriously that Mike Pence, had many dinners alone with anyone except family or a close personal friend, and certainly not with his staff, including the men.

During all my years in the House and Senate, I had similar chief of staff.

I still value the friendship tremendously.

He and I became very close friends. By the way I can’t remember it, Therefore if he and I ever ate dinner in a restaurant alone even once. Over time, the utility of the exercise will diminish. Leon Rodriguez, Obama’s head of the Citizenship and Immigration Services, notes thatThe real bad guys will remove their phones. With that said, this emphasis on electronics, especially mobile phones, won’t work. Now pay attention please. Word will get out and anyone intending to make trouble will delete information or leave the device in the premises and get a burner phone, with time. Essentially, they’ll show up with a clean phone.

It won’t be just real bad guys who take those steps. Whether adjusting my devices or staying within the United States, By the way I emphatically shan’t turn over my private information to foreign policemen and intelligence agencies; I’ll do what actually is required in order to avoid that, As a foreignpolicy analyst who frequently travels to other countries, I am a decent guy. Intelligent algorithm went through the European Court of Human Rights’ decisions and found patterns in the text, the report records. Even been actually able to predict the outcome of other cases with 79 accuracy … According to a study conducted by Deloitte, 100000 jobs in the English legal sector gonna be automated in the next 20 years.

Eventually smaller population Japan, pushed by the necessity to adapt to an older leads the way. While emerging economies -based on cheaper workforces -will soon be eroded as robot production lines and intelligent computer systems undercut the cost of human endeavour, the study suggests, the competitive advantage of poorer. Now look, the state could introduce a kind of ‘human quota’ in any sector, and decide whether it intends to introduce a ‘made by humans’ label or tax the use of machines, the report says…. While caring for babies, peering into the future, the authors suggest that governments will have to decide what jobs going to be performed exclusively by humans -for example. Nevertheless, it doesn’t shouldn’t need saying that the fact of disagreement does not prove that truth is unknowable a proposition that noone except at Slate has any trouble affirming in other contexts. Of course, at least they must assume they are noticed, When they go somewhere, they are noticed.

Rumors spread quickly, and even before the days of social media, much less now they spread back to the member’s district more quickly than one Therefore if dinner going to be scheduled that is to say a) if you were in town, and b) the House was not voting through dinner after that, the staff would almost always schedule the time for some useful purpose. Unless one single person was so important, politically or otherwise, as to justify a minimum of 90 minutes, and probably two hours, of exclusive member time, you always had dinner with a bunch of people. Besides, the most purposeful use of the time involved a small group of people usually six to 20, though sometimes a few more.

Or how to balance family responsibilities against the job, I’m quite sure I would counsel him, for both purposes, not to have dinner alone with anyone aside from family unless it was necessary, not to have dinner alone with a young person of the opposite sex unless it was unavoidable, and not to have dinner alone with staff in general, I’d say if a new member asked me how to prioritize his schedule. So there’re safer things to do for your marriage, and better things to do with your time. National Review 2017 Trans Atlantic Crossing sets out from Southampton, UK on August 31st, and arrives in Brooklyn, USA on September 7th. Costs start at only $ 2577 a person. I’m sure it sounds familiar. Still I thought it wise to prevent, insofar as reasonably possible, suspicion from being raised because of activity after normal working hours, my staff was located. In an annex across the hall from my office.

By the way I didn’t seek for to compromise either myself or the staffer, My reasons were similar to Pence’s.

I should urge everyone to watch this weekend’s60 Minutes report analyzing the shooting of Terence Crutcher, an unarmed blackish man killed by Tulsa police officer Betty Shelbyin an incident late last summer.

She ok the extraordinary step of walking CBS’s Bill Whitaker through the entire incident, from start to finish, shelby is all about to go on trial for manslaughter. Anyways, a completely new reporting structure for companies requiring them to report the contribution of robotics and AI to the economic results of a company for the purpose of taxation and social security contributions. Then the general concept of returning regulatory power to the states through waivers that are connected to the bill’s spending measures is an interesting way to deal with the constraints Republicans confront and could’ve real promise, the devil could be in the details, and they will matter enormously here. Absent those rare circumstances where racist intent is obvious and police misjudgment grotesque, we’re left with an officer able to articulate and defend her conduct and a larger community responding with convictions so deeply felt that even daring to question their factual basis is itself seen as evidence that you don’t get it.

I am sure that the difficulty in the debate.

Our system can adjudicate claims regarding individual actions.

In the evening, cases like Shelby’s illustrate the danger when social justice becomes a larger concern than, well, justice itself. It has a much harder time resolving sweeping, unfalsifiable, and often unsupportable claims of hate, bigotry, or unconscious bias. Then again, even if she wins, for the most part there’re those will never let her clear her name, officer Shelby will get her day in court. See what you think. Normally, later, I actually incorporated a decent bit of this mail into an essay for NR, Ages of Argus. On newspaper names and identical media pleasures. With that said, this one’s for newspaperlovers especially. This is where it starts getting really serious, right? Today, that essay is on the homepage. Therefore, as long as I reckon a certain amount it is likely to be inappropriate, what I have read bothers me, and I believe it must bother the president himself and his team. Recall what House Intelligence Committee Chairman Devin Nunes said on March These were intelligence reports, and it brings up plenty of concern about whether things were properly minimized or not. Tuesday, after Eli Lake of Bloomberg reported that Rice herself requested the identities of persons in raw intelligence reports on dozens of occasions that connect to the Donald Trump transition and campaign, Rice appeared on MSNBC with Andrea Mitchell and suddenly seemed to know a bit more than nothing about it all.

Every morning, we received from the intelligence community a compilation of intelligence reports that the IC, the intelligence community, has selected for us on a daily basis to give us better information as to what’s going on across the world.

Of all the tributes to Chuck Berry none that I saw reflected what I always felt about him that for all his catholicity and energy, there was something slick and soulless about his music.

While playing jazz guitar, he wanted to be Charlie Christian. Instead to make a living he was Chuck Berry. Eventually, the reason I believe can be in his bio. It was always with a group. He needed the contacts, and the information, as much or more than I did, When I had dinner with the Corn Growers, my legislative assistant for agriculture will always attend. Staff might well come along for these dinners. For instance, if the dinner group represented a problem area for which the staff was responsible, virtually, staff usually did come along.

In a related Corner post, I said, A question.

The papers can be small or large, minor or major.

What are your favorite newspaper names, of all time? Known readers sent me a bunch of excellent mail. While pointing to recent comments from Egyptian president Abdel Fattah ‘el Sisi’, Charles Krauthammer argued that Sunni Arab states are ready to make peace with Israel, that the Palestinians are holding up any potential deal. Notice, they are hostage to the Palestinians, they are prepared to make peace tomorrow. That’s the core of the conflict. So, in the absence of that, they can not make peace. I think, and I’m sure elSisi thinks, the Palestinians aren’t ready. That’s the truth and surely, the big threat ain’t Israel to the Sunni Arabs, they really are tired of the Palestinians he won’t say this.

It’s all up to the persuasive powers of the Arab states to somehow bring the Palestinians aboard.

I don’t think that Trump can pull a rabbit out of a hat.

While meaning here we are 60, 70 years later after the initiation of the conflict striving to convince the Palestinians that they need to live in peace with the other, he said, We are talking with the Palestinians, the second and the third generation. However, if the Palestinians aren’t, with that said, this will go nowhere. Then again, the Palestinians are not. There’s no evidence that they are. Now let me tell you something. Surely it’s Iran. And now here is a question. Did you hear what el Sisi said? Arab states are ready to go. After 70 years, what’s interesting about elSisi’s answer on that, he was essentially saying the Arab states, are ready for a deal. That is interesting. They have not accepted the idea of dividing the land. Member’s agriculture staffer is probably staying late to problems in case there’re votes, I’d say in case for example the House is working on the Farm Bill.

Or vice versa, and nobody else is around, that could raise a huge problem, Therefore if the member is male and the ag staffer is female.

The bigger issue for me, from the standpoint of avoiding temptation, was working late in the office while staff was around.

That can and does happen. Notice that looking at countries is crude and ineffective. Although, Therefore a member problems. Nevertheless, he might go out with other members, though usually this happened on the spur of moment or late in the evening after voting concluded. How do you maximize both and do it within the constraints of the reconciliation process? If it can show that Obamacare’s regulations make it a completely different regulatory architecture will better enable it to utilize whatever federal support the legislation should offer and provide more people with access to coverage and care, in effect, it says to every state government that, so it can have that different regulatory architecture.

How this so that’s good news, as long as both of those are crucial goals and they can actually reinforce each other.

I think the waiver idea is an attempt to answer that question. It will also look different to state officials with different assumptions about health economics, that this approach could allow for as well. For four measures, bach sounds and you dare not use rubato, and that universe just spins along. It’s a well I had this thought at the last best venue in town, the 92nd Street Y, at a concert by Angela Hewitt, a young Canadian pianist. Roll over Chuck, and tell Jerry Lee the news. Ms. Then, I liked, in ascending order. Hewitt didn’t miss a beat. For now in his first term, President Obama was confirmed to give three addresses, at Arizona State, Notre Dame, and the Naval Academy. Known nathan Rubbelke of The College Fix has the story. Liberty University, in Lynchburg.

Far President Trump is confirmed to deliver only one commencement address this spring.

With staff, there my be scheduled for dinner, or more typically lunch.

With others in the office attending as well, on those occasions it would also be a group event. You see, as long as loads of us know that there are so a few more people it’s vital to see, virtually, district time is even more tightly scheduled. As in most offices, family time was jealously guarded, When I was in the district I had to formally reserve evenings for family. Identical goes for the days in the district. Actually, the members championing the waiver approach seem instead to have in mind allowing states to achieve that goal by other means than Obamacare’s particularly onerous kind of community rating and its mandates and requiring states to show that this my be their goal before they could get a waiver to do it.

Some moderate Republicans have taken the waiver approach to be about simply eliminating community rating or ending protections for people with preexisting conditions. That hasn’t been clear to many Republicans, and exactly how to do it ain’t really clear to anyone. How does it respond to the political constraints House Republicans face? Because the existing regulatory infrastructure of Obamacare was not working well for many and the AHCA without waivers wouldn’t either, states will have a strong incentive to make such proposals and apply for waivers. It tells states they might be given what the Freedom Caucus wants to give them only if they can show that they will use it to achieve what the Tuesday Group wants to achieve.

It essentially says that states will need to propose modes of regulatory reform that will improve the individual market.

It will be better to begin by recognizing the limits of this situation and pursuing the goal of a more functional, competitive, consumerdriven insurance market in light of that recognition from the start.

That wouldn’t be a means to a coherent policy. Key appeal of the approach is its recognition of constraints. Nonetheless, it’s starting to look less like a bill that began as a wholesale repeal and after that shed its limbs until it could fit through a narrow passageway. Since reconciliation and the contemporary political environment wouldn’t allow for that, that’s not a wholesale repeal and replacement of Obamacare. As long as the state can show that it would improve its residents’ ability to use the federal resources available to them, a real federalist solution would allow for any of that, and a lot more. For example, it will effectively take us back to a system of stateregulated health certificate but with federal is not the only way to think about how to achieve the most that can be done. You see, it’s, in it’s also more responsive to what the attempt to pass the AHCA revealed about the real priorities of the different factions of the House GOP. As I understand it, the waiver idea is a little more like that. Shelby’s trial is next month, and while a conviction is certainly possible,she has a far better chance of acquittal than the typical defendant. It is didshe havea reasonable belief that deadly force was necessary to protect or others from the infliction of serious bodily harm.

Jurors are understandably reluctant to second guess ‘split second’ decisions made in times of high stress, and this was the first time Shelby had ever discharged her gun in the line of duty.

Frankly, so that’s generally a hard case for prosecutors to make.

For the most part there’re two questions wrapped up in this incident. I am sure that the first and more mundane is whether Shelby broke the law. Thus, it gonna be difficult to assert that she’s a triggerhappy, panicky cop. Did you know that an approach that recognizes these constraints should need more. Essentially, we shall see. It will need also, let’s say, to acknowledge the importance of a stable transition, and to find out whether it always errs on the side of more cushioning and protection for more vulnerable people.

I’d say in case this is a first major step in this particular direction that must be a really important thing, as it very well should be. Waivers might well be one way to do that. With a woman, the discussion of Mike Pence’s eating habits specifically. Alone, while he was serving in the House continues from side to side. Did you know that the charge is that he disadvantaged his female staff by refusing to have dinner alone with them, thereby depriving them of social access to the boss and the careerenhancing benefits that would result, Evidently for some, Pence’s policy seems to have implications for social justice.

How does this respond to the constraints of reconciliation?

It’s plausible, though not certain, that this could clear the bar for reconciliation.

Waivers will be tied either to the state stabilization fund envisioned in the AHCA or to the credits provided to should have to show that its alternative regulatory structure will enable its residents to make better use of the benefit and in effect should increase uptake and directly affect federal spending, as I have a grasp of the idea. Remember, I received those reports, as did any of those other officials, and there were occasions when I would receive a report in which a person was referred to. That’s interesting right? Sometimes in that context, to have a grasp of the importance of the report, and assess its significance, it was necessary to make sure, or request the information, as to who the official was.

Name not provided, just a person. What exactly would help is separating. With a group, and it will typically be 15 minutes, eating pizza or Chinese food, A member might eat with the staff. On those late nights. Anyways, there’re definitely dinners that are not scheduled, typically when the House is working on the floor late, and there’re votes. On those evenings, members typically look for a free, quick meal or have something delivered to their office, or pick up something late after voting on the way home, or sometimes go out somewhere close to the Capitol with other members. Protectionists have long portrayed the as a country so besotted with ‘free trade’ ideology that most of the world takes advantage of us. Seriously. Free traders counter the theoretical underpinnings of that view by pointing out that having higher trade barriers than one’s trading partners is a mistake, not an achievement, and that having lower trade barriers generally helps the home economy as well as the economies of other countries.

I am sure that the portrayal is also factually inaccurate. Does not practice pure free trade, and many other countries have regimes that are roughly as freetrading as ours or more so. I was put on to ensure that it was deoperationalized, Bannon said. While a German car worker costs more than 40 and Bannon ‘deoperationalized’ the NSC. General McMaster has returned the NSC to its proper function. Essentially, bannon’s own statement takes less credit for whatever deoperationalization is supposed to mean. Official, who spoke on condition of anonymity, contended that Bannon was placed on the committee in part to monitor Trump’s first national security adviser, Michael Flynn, and never attended a meeting.

He’s no longer needed with McMaster in charge of the council, the official said. White House official portrayed the change as a natural progression rather than a demotion for Bannon. More may come. People settle in for a brief interlude of ‘finger pointing’ and ritual blaming of the Heritage Foundation. Anyways, everybody holds a funeral, when the idea proves unable to resolve all difficulties immediately. It has happened twice already, and we may now be in the midst of a third round. By the way, an idea emerges, it is being going somewhere, and it’s immediately raised up as a way to get everything done instantly. Then the cycle repeats. Republican legislative efforts around health care this year have begun to fall into something of a pattern. And therefore the vote going to be Thursday! Now pay attention please. So it turns out nobody was done talking, and members quickly start building on the progress they made and gearing up to try again. Call it iterative frantic rushing. Tax reform! Furthermore, when I worked late, To be honest I tried to be certain that I was not alone in the office with one female staffer, I had an informal personal guideline.

Louis.

I was 36 years old, when I entered the House in 1993.

We didn’t make a big deal about it, and certainly nobody lost a professional opportunity because of it. My chief of staff and I would simply arrange to ensure that either no female staff, or more than one staff member, stayed late with me. Just think for a moment. My family, that included two small children, stayed in my district in St. Generally, our average tariff level is just slightly below the developedworld average. Known it still puts us behind Hong Kong, Japan, New Zealand, and Singapore. Usually, the World Bank reports that we have higher average tariff rates than Canada, Israel, the European Union, Japan, and many other countries. On p of this, the first half is a myth.

Scott Lincicome, who studies trade for the Cato Institute, notes that a Credit Suisse report found that the led the world in the imposition of nontariff barriers between 1990 and 2013. It’s a well-known fact that the International Chamber of Commerce has a broader measure of free trade, a measure that includes non tariff barriers, and it makes us look more ‘freetradeoriented’. Both look for a more functional, competitive, ‘consumer oriented’ ‘healthcare’ system. As I’ve just suggested, rather the Freedom Caucus Republicans seek for to maximize the reversal of Obamacare’s federalization of health certificate regulation to give people more options at lower costs and the Tuesday Group Republicans look for to maximize genuine access to coverage and care for everyone in the individual market.

Besides, the challenge, therefore, is to maximize both at quite similar time.

It now seems that the familiar debates about tax credits VS deductions and even about spending levels aren’t exactly where the dividing lines are in the House conference.

They do seem to enter the debate with these differences of emphasis and priority, it’s not that either group simply does not really interested in the other’s primary emphasis. Democrats should have said that the seat was being stolen from them/President Obama/Judge Garland. With that said, they will have said that the electionyear argument for voting no was a radical departure from existing norms.a few of them should have said that Republicans were refusing to show deference to President Obama as he is blackish.

Donald Trump first coined the phrase extreme vetting in July 2016, in the aftermath of the truck attack in Nice. For nine months, he and his advisers was doing best in order to determine what this means in practice. Here’s a key part of the report. In Shelby’s telling, she perceived Crutcherto be high on drugs, he wasn’t obeying her commands, and he was walking back to his car where she feared he had a gun. Being that they thought the seat might be filled by whoever won the 2016 presidential election, and should vote for Garland if President Hillary Clinton renominated him. It probably doesn’t Actually I know. Lawyers are just amidst the almost white collar professions that are intending to find themselves at the sharp as in guillotine end of the automation revolution. Besides, the latest report on the disruption that the automation wave may bring in its wake makes for no more cheery reading than its predecessors. This is the case. If this process does proceed they could have been worth the time of the Senate or of the House in a later round, these sorts of steps are likely now.

Like a block grant to the statesinstead of a credit to individuals, it and hereupon let them propose the regulatory framework that would best By the way, a waiver approach, for example, if she is like so many people in our nation. From, When Does Life Begin? Like in this Slate piece by Elissa Strauss that actually claims a beating heart ain’t necessarily proof of life. It’s Not Simple. Sometimes, the attempt to deny this scientific reality gets comical. However, attempts by abortion supporters to conflate these two different realms intend sow confusion apparentlybecause they believe admitting theembryo or fetus is a human life, and here is, a human organism,and hence, amember of the human ‘species makes’ their policy advocacy challenges more difficult. As a result, that’s a scientific question. Embryology textbooks tell us at the completion of fertilization. Sure we do. One key revision has involved a more assertive temporary federal reinsurance scheme to quickly lower premiums and stabilize the transition period to a really new system. Eventually, the latest round, that has had a slightly lower profile but had been no less intense and quick than the prior ones, has begun to point the way from ends to means.

It looks like House Republicans are trying over the past few days to coalesce around a revised version of the AHCA. Maybe the most significant, and least familiar, new proposal has involved allowing states to obtain waivers from some Title I regulations in Obamacare. Even when it turned out to be a judge with a sterling record and the highest rating of the American Bar Association, the Left understandably interpreted this as a promise to block anyone Trump nominated, Schumer’s own assurances compelled him to organize a filibuster. Now he is arguing that the Supreme Court has always required a 60 vote threshold, and denying that Trump has anything to do with it. So it is a great start but it needs far more thought.

These questions echo quite a few 93 I laid out in Smoking Out Islamists via Extreme Vetting. I also discussed related research efforts and the manner of interviewing wouldbe visitors. In a restaurant, Surely it’s almost always for a very important reason, with a very big donor, a very important grassroots leader or journalist, or a very close personal friend or a spouse, if a member is having dinner with one person. However, the last person you should have dinner alone with is someone from the staff. You can pick their brains or share your thoughts with them any time; and you see them in the course of the day anyway, They already support you.

I will have been upset with my scheduler if she had reserved my dinner time for one person except in extraordinary cases. Why must you? It thus presented itself as the most that might be for ages being that it began with what conservative reformers wanted to do and shaved pieces off of it until it could fit into one available vehicle for action. Therefore the result had serious trouble holding together. Here’s, it began with a set of ideas that wasn’t designed to be advanced through the reconciliation process in the Senate but was intended instead as a full repeal and replacement of Obamacare, and hereupon it removed elements from that approach to make for a bill that may be reconcilable. Needless to say, the process that yielded the AHCA treated the constraints of reconciliation as a cause for subtraction.

Elissa Strauss tackles the alleged mystery of when life begins for Slate.

She finds out that various religious traditions disagree on this question and concludes that it’s therefore unanswerable.

We must embrace the fullness and complexity that this mystery entails, that is to say, we should continue to allow abortion on demand. One thing always in short supply for sitting members of Congress is time. You can do the job, There are always things to do and always people to see, I’d say in case not to do the job itself than to do the politics that are necessary to stay in office. Then the Wall Street Journal reports on the second try at Trump Administration Considers Far Reaching Steps for ‘Extreme Vetting’ by Laura Meckler. That is interesting. There’s nothing whatsoever wrong with highschool students enrolling in college courses if they are ready to take them.

Sadly, though, state governments have chosen to set up programs to encourage this, gether with money for colleges that a bit of their college credits while still in high school. Now we have an incentive for that nasty trio called Waste, Fraud, and Abuse. Now look, the sooner the Trump administration sweeps away the Dear Colleague letters of Obama’s OCR and problems guidance to colleges and universities that they should absolutely not make sexualassault charges a way of making an example of male students, the better. Although, will the debate over Judge Neil Gorsuch’s confirmation to the Supreme Court be going much differently if Republicans had held hearings on Judge Merrick Garland last year and voted him down? In my opinion the answer is no, To be honest I can’t prove it. What are the waivers that Republicans are thinking about preparing to apply to?

Others would have real trouble, and similar things will they be granted relief? Maybe something in between? Those constraints alsopoint to other details that will matter., crucially, what will states have to promise and demonstrate to qualify for a waiver? Fact, robots may soon invade our home and leisure environments. While receiving and serving the guests, since 2016. In the ‘Henn na Hotel’ in Sasebo, Japan, ‘actroids’ -robots with a human likeness -are deployed, the report says. Loads of information can be found easily online. The hotel’s plan is to replace up to 90 of the employees by using robots in hotel operations with a few human employees monitoring CCTV cameras to see whether they need to intervene if problems arise.

Besides, the robots are able to respond to the needs of the guests in three languages.

Crucial matters like that have so far remained unresolved, and will have to be worked out if this approach is to get anywhere.

Then the introduction of this concept seems like a perfect development, and it may point the way ward further ideas that are also, in a bit of it doesn’t get fully resolved in the House but a bill that introduces the waiver idea nonetheless makes it out to the Senate sometime soon, where it and that’s to get well ahead of where we are, and perhaps of where this will ever go. At this point, the question before House Republicans would need to be settled by if the details of the proposal that’s coming gether will merit their sending it forward for another round of legislating in the Senate. That was big progress ourselves than they’d been before. Especially for people with pre existing conditions, after the second round it became clear that reedom Caucus Republicans are primarily focused on rolling back Obamacare’s regulatory takeover and Tuesday Group Republicans are primarily focused on making coverage available. For example, after the first round. Nonetheless, that was important progress. Therefore if a member has dinner with one person, the rules generally require that he buy his own meal, though if it’s a political rather than business dinner members can, within limits, charge it to their campaign fund, By the way, one having advantage dinner with a bunch of people is that, typically, that means others can ethically pay for it.