Aug
27

That Sundress Like Most Of Them – Dad Sends His Little Girl Off To School In A Sundress What She’s In At Pickup Leaves Him Seething

Author admin    Category sundresses     Tags

sundressesRouner is aware of rape concept culture, understanding that the idea of a girl with too much skin showing is somehow opening the door to everything from commentary about her purity to outright assault widelyexists.

And now here is the question. Did you look at the picture good? That sundress, like plenty of them, has an elastic top. Even if both staps fall down the top isn’t going anywhere. No revealed chest and nothing for anyone to find unacceptable.

The rule isn’t shameful. The only thing shameful is a father who likes teaching his special snowflake that she is above the rules. It’s that boys have to wear pants and a shirt, I’d say if you want to rant about sexism.

How is a sundress provocative, is that the case? My job -any woman’s or girl’s job -in life is NOT to act or dress in a way that makes sure boys and men behave. It is time to hold men and boys accountable instead of making us alter ourselves to be sure they don’t molest or rape us. ARE sexist. You should take it into account. The older the girls get, the longer their lists get while the boys’ list is and remains short. You should take this seriously.a collarbone, a little back, some leg, knees, he needs to seek counseling as to why he’s easily aroused and unable to control himself, if a boy or man gets hard and loses all sense of ‘selfcontrol’ from a pair of shoulders. His wife suggested that Rouner, who is a writer, compose an opinion piece.

< >

Recently Viewed Articles.

In his piecein the Houston Press,he says that when he picked her up that afternoon he wasn’t surprised to see her in herwarmer outfit.

Work toward changing the rules, So if you want to change the rules.

On the otherside, this little ladies dress ain’t offensive as long as there isSo there’s no dress code. To be honest I applauded the schoolfor enforcing the rules, if there isfor the most part there’s a dress code. Something that isn’t the norm these days. With that said, what actually is the causes of the no spaghetti straps rule -other than that someone believes it is provocative in some way. It is to apply that rule to a 5 year old creates a disturbing result -when you think about it. If they want to have a rule -all shirts must have at least short sleeves -and applied to boys and girls -would not be offensive. Saying, no spaghetti straps, is what makes it offensive -when applied to a five year old girl.

Wow, can not believe this has to be explained, the point is the little girl was not allowed to wear a spaghetti strap dress at 5 age, this is presumably because the school feels its showing too much skin.

Its not about a dress code, do you understand now? On top of this, its sexualisation of a small child which is dreadful. Read the article again please! Girls do not have an implicit dress code. For example, girls have much more latitude to dress as they want. Anyway, the schools have to set explicit dress codes.

The PTA doesn’t decide but bringing it up to them creates discussion and you will find the parents consensus. So if a lot of the parents agree with you have backing with the school board. Rule is directed at girls since If they don’t maybe it is time to find a new school for your daughter No it has to do with being a girl -only girls wear spaghetti straps. To sexualize a child of that age with a rule like that is unbelievably disturbing to me. What actually is the causes of such a rule with a 5 year old?

You think they actually think for themselves, this is the case right?

It’s about funding, as with everything. States all changed their drinking ages and speed limits at points in the past to be sure they continued to receive federal highway funds. It’s the same with BS school boards all over the country. They operate out of fear. There’s some more information about this stuff on this site. The rules laid out by other government types or funding sources scare local school boards into making nonsense choices that cause all of these inequities between treatment types boys and girls receive Whether explicit,, or implicit. Essentially, boys already have a dress code. It’s implicit. Notice that pants and a shirt.

You obviously didn’t read the article, there are no rules for boys but a 5 year old girl cannot wear a sun dress. This is totally unfair and sexist. For instance, it shows boys can wear what they like but girls must wear suitable clothes even at this age. This is the wrong message, we need to raise boys to accept girls for whatever they do or wear without discrimination. Dress Code. Please rethink this.

This ain’t an attempt for Rouner to speak for women.

He says that a significant number of women have contacted him telling him that they wish their own fathers had spoken out like he did. For him, that is huge. Therefore, if boys could wear dresses and skirts and skorts and tube tops and blouses and spaghetti straps and sundresses and.

You miss the point that you can’t have a different dress code for different grade levels. You need to define measurable standards. However, for instance all shirts must have sleeves avoids confusion. Everywhere you draw a line that is where the battle occurs. As a supervisor of adults the need to define standards does not change. Some people just have no judgement. How many boys have ‘spaghettistrapped’ shirts and dresses, right? The no spaghetti straps rule is clearly for girls and it always has been. Girls’ clothes are designed to sexualize them more and more, and at younger ages, Boys’ clothes are designed in ways that will not get them in trouble for being provocative. Remember, they get in trouble for not adhering to dress codes that are designed to explain to boys that girls are merely sexual objects, and explain to both boys and girls that it’s the girls’ fault for arousing a boy. It’s practically entrapment.

Why does everyone forget that there are actually dress code rules that apply to boys, is that the case?

At most schools, boys aren’t allowed to wear tank tops, short shorts, baggy jeans that show thier boxers, clothes with large holes that show skin, go bare foot, wear anything with explicit or gang related prints, go to school without a shirt or pants, wear clothing with chains or cross dress. Boys are pretty much limited to pants or shorts and tshirts, or button ups or polos. Overalls, if you can find them. Girls get much more variety to dress. Pretty sure its the religious people.

Post comment

Recent Posts

Categories