Via Wikipediacom Just In Time For The Oscars – Best Dresses For Party

admin    best dresses for party     Auto, Draft

Party 1920s dresses were made for movement, like the designs at left from the National Suit Cloak Co, with their dropped waists and unstructured tops.

Just in time for the Oscars, WayneGuite helped us compile a gorgeous, decade by decade guide to top-notch party 20th dresses century, looks as showstopping day as when they first hit the scene. Via wikipedia. Now please pay attention. Alice Joyce.

Not a lot of them exist anymore, at least the dresses that were wellworn. Clearly this was widespread, she lived in orth Dakota, its owner might have been upper class. The lampshade silhouette was pretty avantgarde. On p of that, some were less shapely and more sack like, and after all others had a lampshade look with a hoop around the hip area. That’s right! While creating an even more stimulating effect when she was dancing, when the garment went into motion, the whole dress was activated. However, they generally went just past the hip, or fell somewhere between the knee and hip, and flared out around the hoop. They would fall apart. We had a ‘lampshadestyle’ dress, when I worked with the collection at North Dakota State University.

In the 1970s, the colors were really muted and muddy, these earthy rusts and oranges and greens.

We turned to super bright and neon colors, in the ’80s, people wanted something fresh and different. Styles from different Eastern countries were often melded into one garment. As Lycras and spandexes were entering the market in larger numbers, you also had a bunch of fabrics with more stretch to them so tight party dresses were really popular. On p of that, she’s seeing those looks in magazines, and copying them herself. You should take it into account. There wasn’t a whole lot of purity in fashion it was an amalgamation of all these cultures rolled into one garment. It’s that fashion idea cycle, that we want to see what we haven’t seen in a long time. Then, it’s not that the ‘middle class’ woman in America was buying Poiret. We have a robe in the Columbia collection that has Japanese kimonostyle sleeves, ‘Chinesestyle’ metallic embroidery, and colors that look Indianinfluenced. This all has a ‘trickledown’ effect.

You definitely see them in the ’50s, mostly small florals, novelty prints got started in the 1940s. They really wanted to live it up, when people went to a party. Actually, it wasn’t just one fabric and one color. Because they wanted that freedom once in a while, they cut back a whole heck of a lot more on everyday dresses and splurged a bit more on their party dress. It’s this culture of escapism. Usually, during the daytime, everyone had to be very utilitarian. Hollywood movies in the 1930s are all about escaping the economy troubles and everyday life. This is the case. It’s always small and feminine and pretty. Fact, it would probably have some netting, lace, silk satin, or rayon on it, if the dress was one color. It’s not anything loud. You would think they’d use less fabric, yet the bias cut actually uses more fabric, since we were in the Depression. Then again, they wanted to have some sort of visual variety. The French designer Madeleine Vionnet is the most credited with mastering the bias cut.

Really like this set from Right, Left, pattern makers like McCall’s and ogue made the New Look available to middle American women, teenage girls at a ‘highschool’ dance in monochromatic, multitextured dresses, circa Via shorpy.

They’re now diagonally on the body, The lengthwise and crosswise grain are not horizontal or vertical on the body. On p of that, it hugs the body more closely because That changes a garment fit. When you refer to the Old Hollywood look, generally most people are 1930s thinking, and it’s these idea silk satins or velvets that cling to the body. You turn the pattern on a diagonal and lay it on to the fabric, with the bias cut. With that said, we go from the boxy, boyish shape of the ‘20s to a very womanly shape. It hugs your curves, since there’s more stretch on the bias.

The garment literal foundation is of much lower quality, not only are the rhinestones and fabrics cheaper today. They were wearing mod suits, the Beatles weren’t wearing party dresses. You had artists like Andy Warhol, and his muses were wearing very mod styles. Because there was still this notion that the foundation had to be good, they all have built in boning, the collection I currently work with has some cheap 1950s dresses, things you would’ve bought at an inexpensive department store. That pop art period and the music people listened to were all converging and influencing fashion, and fashion was also influencing them. That’s interesting right? You don’t seecan’t see corsetry built into a dress anymore, unless you’re buying expensive formalwear.

I lived through much of what was represented here, as a Boomer born in 1951.

The organization by decade is a great presentation of the times fashions. Very good interview questions! Just keep reading! They wanted to show off that movement. They were moving their whole bodies. A well-known fact that is. It was also amongst the first times women were moving more than just their feet when they danced. They’re moving their hips, They’re moving their legs. You need a shorter skirt to do those moves as well as to show off your body while doing them.

Instead of better tailoring or putting in boning or a petersham, Nowadays, designers make up a lot through stretch fabrics, which was like a waistband that was put inside a dress to attach the bodice to your waist. Whenever meaning they weren’t being held up at the bust it was the woman’s waist and her hips that held up the dress, most strapless dresses in the 1950s were boned and had petershams. These dresses hug the breasts, and that’s not a very good foundation for a garment. For example, your foundation would be much lower, and there was no need to hike up the dress. They fal off, you have these beautiful dresses that the bride and bridesmaids are constantly hiking up because they’re attached with cheap stretch fabric.

We recently had a ‘one shoulder’ dress from the ’80s donated to the Columbia collection, and the shoulder with a strap has these giant fabric flowers.

Right, Iman models for YSL’s Rive Gauche line in 1980, which incorporated bright colors and excess fabric just beneath the shoulder line. It’s really cool that they were bringing so much attention to that one shoulder with all this fabric, It’s a little jarring to the eye today. Usually, left, this Yves Saint Laurent ensemble from 1980 raised the bar for bold shoulder detailing. They’re huge, and there are lots of them. Via metmuseum.

The 1960s are interesting because you start to see a speeding up of trends. Designers incorporated these mock necklaces that were actually sewn onto the dress around the collar or the neckline. Nonetheless, you’d have this big, chunky, embellished cuff on your dress, instead of wearing a bracelet. Of course by the end ’60s, mod was almost dead, and fashion had moved onto this very chunky embellishment, especially for party dresses. Left, Twiggy wears a pink felt shift dress on Seventeen cover magazine in Right, Yves Saint Laurent’s Mondrian dress embodies the quintessential mod look, circa Via metmuseum. Then again, women wanted heavier, more bohemian embellishments on their dresses, instead of streamlined.

They always have to slim them down because the dresses were quite dumpy by today’s standards, when costume designers create garments for movies set in the ’20s.

They wanted to look streamlined, They didn’t want to look super feminine. Via shorpy. In the 21st century, we want to see a bit body more, and designers weren’t really showing much of it because women didn’t want to look womanly. The dresses were these boxy, boyish shapes, and to our contemporary eye, that doesn’t look very chic. Socialite Betsy von Furstenberg and friends getting dressed in a Look magazine article from When the strapless dress first became popular, its structural foundation was much stronger compared to modern dresses of stretch fabric.

Women were going places ‘un chaperoned’ and were just more physically mobile. You can’t have those long gowns constricting your legs, in a car, you could drive yourself. You see, for the most part, they were cutting back on fabric, that definitely flouted the law. It is there’s excess fabric under the arm, It’s all one piece. Yes, that’s right! They’re climbing in and out of cars more, and so they need a shorter skirt to get in and out unescorted. Just keep reading! Many garments were decorated in buttons, sequins, or anything people could get their hands on to embellish a party dress. You should take it into account. There were no restrictions on embellishments like sequins, or spangles as they would’ve called them, or elaborate, ‘rhinestonecovered’ buttons. Even though it used much more material than a setin sleeve would, the dolman sleeve was very popular. Basically, it’s similar to a loose, kimono style sleeve without any seam between the bodice and the sleeve. There’s a gentleman or driver to help you, when you’re getting into a horse and buggy.

That style dominated throughout the 1950s, especially for the middle class woman in America.

The New Look worked its way down to her, she was buying that trickle down fashion, she was not buying Dior. Now that the jeans and T shirts plague has reached our fancy restaurants, cocktail parties, and nightclubs, it seems as though nobody cares about dressing up anymore. It’s really the first time we see Middle America wearing these cute, strapless, ‘prom style’ dresses. That said, yet, as fashions become increasingly casual, the perfect party dress is like a secret weapon turning anyone into a rose among daisies. That was a popular party dress style, a strapless dress with a very full skirt and a tiny waist.

The 1960s were like Heck no! Young women wanted to wear short skirts. We’re going to focus on day youth. That said, it was the first time you had skirts above the knee. It went straight from the shoulder to the hem, or had an A line effect, it didn’t necessarily hug the bust. Your party dress was probably a basic, Aline shift dress that hung its weight from the upper body. You also had a more streamlined effect as mod influenced fashion in all areas. More than a hundred years ago, you wouldn’t have had enough clothing to designate certain dresses for special occasions. We’re tired of these ‘usedup’, old fashioned ideas. Of course, middleclass women could consume, the economy was great. So, you could now have specialized clothing for different occasions, including parties. Essentially, with more readymade clothing, fashion production became easier and cheaper. Moving into the 1910s and ’20s, we started to see major upward mobility. They were pretty boxy.

Publicity stills taken of Norma Shearer (left, in and Jean Harlow (right, in flaunt their sultry, biascut silk dresses.

Photographer George Hurrell captured Old glamour Hollywood styles, which amped up the sex appeal using halter ps and low cut backs. Via metmuseum. You see, right, this Vionnet gown shows how ‘lowcut’ backs contrasted with excessively low hemlines, even in the Depression era when extra fabric was a true luxury. Remember, left, this 1930s advertisement shows the diagonal seams and limited ornamentation of popular bias cut dresses.

The party dress is definitely more casual now, and there’s a much wider types of silhouettes and styles.

It’s not a big deal when only the people at that event see your dress. Also, most middleclass women would have had one good dress to wear for evening, parties, weddings, or other formal occasions. People wouldn’t even know you wore the same dress repeatedly, you didn’t have as many parties to go to. You weren’t going to be photographed and have your pictures spread around. Since it didn’t matter if you wore the same dress, you didn’t have dresses for different occasions. If you were wealthy enough to have a party dress, onehundred years ago, you didn’t own a huge variety.

Follow us onTwitter

you can find chic, well made frocks, and afford them, too, since vintage is in vogue. Vintage isn’t just for commoners. Retro looks are regularly featured on the redish carpet, with celebrities plucking gowns from past designer collections or straight from vintage racks stores. Vintage isn’t just for commoners. What are the most stunning, decade defining looks, with so many classic dresses to choose from. What are the most stunning, decade defining looks, with so many classic dresses to choose from. Retro looks are regularly featured on the redish carpet, with celebrities plucking gowns from past designer collections or straight from vintage racks stores. You can find chic, well made frocks, and afford them, too, since vintage is in vogue. Follow us onTwitter.

If you enjoyed this article please consider sharing it!